🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions about that remarks delivered by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's victory over Taylor Fritz during the US Open last eight. Consider – the athlete represents American, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions often lend themselves to nationalism. Some letdown was appropriate. Rather, Fowler invoked the ongoing absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the tournament.

We all enjoy a narrative, myself included. But come on. Suppose the American defeated Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, whom he has yet to beat in an official match. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the next round). Fritz said in post-match interviews after the loss that he actually preferred his path, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the three best competitors in the sport in succession. Fritz is well justified to aspire to the achievement; an athlete is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian quarter-final who else sensibly had the lack of US winners on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

The American, 28, is ranked fourth in the world starting this week’s year-end championships and has secured his last six encounters over No 3 the German with growing comfort. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that is as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class serve and powerful power on each forehand and reverse side are more than enough to defeat the majority of rivals on the professional circuit. When facing the handful of generational talents, though, he is often overmatched. The past few seasons has seen the interesting emergence of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless move around with the alarming quickness and grace of smaller players. He is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the other player was dictating, and hitting a drop shot against him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a quite harsh restriction on his potential.

Fritz has made a number of significant, improbable improvements throughout his career. At the beginning of the decade, he was circling the lower end of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded to fourth place – and held the spot. But the next leap, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, Sinner, and including a declining Serbian, is the highest of all. What was the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the ongoing drought of US male players winning grand slams when he had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just too much and the respect for the difficulty of the task too little.

The American star made a career-best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

The American's play in that very last eight match should have been enough of an indication. The Serbian triumphed in four rounds, a win that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when the American had saved a few match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American earning plenty of chances to break. But Djokovic saved break point after break point, extending the streak to the brink of frustration. When Fritz eventually did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately played a horrendous service game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had drawn him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and forced him to expend excessive effort to win it. Down set points in the last game, his primary delivery floated to the sky. He extended the match twice on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It was not a choke, in my opinion, only a result of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was quite ironclad proof that the American is not good enough to defeat any form of Djokovic, who lost to the Spaniard in the following match and did not particularly appeared like he thought he could win. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the tour regardless. He’s a calm, reflective voice in press conferences, exceeding virtually anyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not only express his emotions or the tactic he felt decided a contest, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States not spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Now that the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that load.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” Fritz informed a journalist in the summer of claiming a major. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is actually extremely improbable for all other players. {